SHOWstudio

Open Forum

Free speech

Jack Cafferty and the CNN PR crisis

Showing messages 1–10 of 56
KaWai
KaWai
United States

Jack Cafferty, a commentator for CNN, made some shallow and general remarks on the Chinese govn't and since then CNN has been facing heavy demands from the Chinese gov't as well as the Chinese public for a formal apology. According to the Washington Post, "CNN apologized to anyone who took offense. It issued a statement that drew a distinction between its news reporting, which it defended as "objective and balanced," and its commentators "who provide robust opinions that generate debate." Cafferty clarified that he was referring to the Chinese government, not the Chinese people in his remarks." Now the PR disaster has gone worse because the Chinese gov't is really insulted, the fact that his statement was directed toward them, and they had issue another statement, "Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said the statements did not go far enough to take back what she called "vile remarks."

"Their statement not only did not make a sincere apology, but also took aim at the Chinese government, attempting to sow dissension between the Chinese government and the people," Jiang said Thursday. "We cannot accept it."

CNN needs to make a distinction between their commentators views and CNN station's view. I am surprised that this type of incident has gone this far. In lots of TV news shows in countries outside of US(even US public television stations), they would issue a statement that explains the views on the show don't reflect the station's views.

Jack Cafferty's statement was stupid and shallow, but in the spirit of freedom of speech, since he is an independent commentator, whose views are of his own, he needs not to apologize. CNN though really needs to clearly explain that Jack's views are of his, I don't think CNN has done such a good job on clarifyiing that. I don't think Chinese gov't is used to this US style of news commentators, which is loud, and kind of uncivilized, nevertheless, as long as he is an independent commentator, not a news reporter, he has a right to his opinion. This incident reminded me of the cartoon published in a European newspaper that stirred up the heat among Muslims.
dyn/content/article/2008/04/17/AR2008041701599.html?hpid=moreheadlines

Reply to this >



Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

I find this an absolutely fascinating subject KaWai ... of course he was referring to the CHINESE GOVERNMENT ...no doubt about that ! ...
I have never met people who has any quarrel of dislike for the Chinese people, who sadly have gone through an appalling history of repression and absolute evil tyranny since Chairman-Mao-Tsetung took over the rains, but the Chinese government is fantastic in the ART OF POLITICAL SPINNING . With the Olympic Games stirring so much controversy, the 'uprising' in Tibet and their huge problems at home with the controversial and totally arbitrary land confiscation in order to sell it to property developers , leaving so many people totally homeless and poorer than before that in the end could explode in an up-rising against the government ...... JACK CAFFERTY has been. indeed,a total blessing in disguise !

I disagree that CNN should had not apologised for the totally undiplomatic remarks, and CNN must maintain certain degree of credibility .. and on the contrary that is an smart move .... leaving the CHINESE government rather empty handed .... but no matter they will try to squeeze what they can out of it ... in order to divert the attention from their real problems and to make themselves, ( the Chinese govenrment) look like the ' innocent victim' ... that is good for then to stir up nationalism and pride so that the people will in the end be unite behind them ... and the real crisis and problems they are facing can for a moment be forgotten and will have to wait !

And as for the cartoons ........ that really needs a different consideration, I think, because that is even more explosive than JACK CAFFERTY's thoughtless remarks

Freedom of expression ABSOLUTELY !... but using street level kind of language when being in a position of influence ..... that is another story !

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

The funny thing is the Chinese public don't like his remarks, even though it was directly to their gov't. They see it as an insult to the entire country. It's one thing for them to criticize their gov't, but it's another to have this humiliation on the world stage. In the NY TImes today, an article was on Chinese in China, how they feel about these oppositions to the current country's policies, the people feel this is not the right time to do this, while the entire country is trying to put together the event, to welcome the foreigners, they feel this is the time to put personal bad feelings toward the gov't aside, not that they don't agree with some of the issues, but this is not the time to disrupt their efforts to put on Olympics for the world.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

As far as Tibet issue, whether it's part of China, there will forever be differences in opinions, the Chinese feel Tibet is their land, had been and will always be, they see the railroad to Tibet, all the advances are positive to Tibetans, but Tibet issue aside, since you and I don't live in Tibet, and we know limited knowledge of China and Tibet's history, we don't know the whole picture. One could argue the comparison of Tibet/China to Europeans/South Aricans/South Americans/Native American Indians. Besides Tibet is a vast land, as big as some of the states in the US, there's no way China would give up Tibet, ever, if China leaves, India might move in, and it did in the past, with help from the British.
There is one statement I had read yesterday in the NY Times which I agree, this young woman studying in the US, she is Chinese and she while protests on campus were going on for and against Chinese gov't hosting the Games, she didn't immediately take sides, and she suggested some of the Chinese students to talk to the Tibetan protestors, understand their side of the story, and she was faced with being labeled as traitor, by her fellow Chinese schoolmates. She said in the Times interview that these people don't know what it means to love China, they think is to just agree, and only have their viewpoints, if oppose to some of the points, or disagree, then one doesn't love China.
When in the times such as now, Some Chinese people don't differentiate between the gov't and the country, or the people and the gov't, if one disagree with the gov't, then one is considered not loving the country, which is obsurd because it's not rational, to question the gov't is a very strong way of sign of loving one's country, one's culture. Because no gov't is completely right or wrong.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

I find the Western media and Communist Party are both good at political spinning. Look at how Bush administration has been defending their quest in Iraq.

Reply to this >



la
la
United Kingdom

considering just how massive China is there is virtually no chinese viewers apparent on this forum ,is that odd?

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to la:

Back to CNN, CNN should have included more points of view, instead of having this kind rambling on with subjectivity, although the guy gets paid for his harsh style, most Chinese in China don't get this style of commentating. But this commentator has the right to his belief of the Chinese gov't, he was just stupid with words and some of the substances(or lack of)
Onto world policy, I do find double standards with dealing with Chinese gov't, China in general vs with the US and European countries, go back to history, Europeans and Americans were never, and are now, not forced to look at themselves and their ancestors on the things they had done to the Africans, to China in Ching Dynasty, to native Americans, to lots of Asians during colonialism. Even today, the US, the way they try to control the oil is by illegally invaded a country which didn't attack them, completely devastated the daily lives of ordinary people, opened a can of worms of all the suppressed ethnic rivalries, without a plan to solve any of their problems. While China, whether people agree or not, is getting oil by negotiating with gov't, whether the gov't is quosi or not, but compare the two, which tactic has caused more death and destruction? The Chinese gov't might indirectly supporting(due to business deals) regional conflicts in Africa, but the US way of invasion completely effect the whole world, immediately affect on the politically hottest spot in the world, which has immediate impact to world economy. In a matter of 7 years, the price per barrel of oil has doubled. Chinese gov't is dealing with the oil supply as business deals, not invading any parts of the middle east or Africa, or South America, they never invaded any other continents in order to get their oil, their gold, their diamonds, their land. The early Americans relocated the native american Indians to some God forsaken land, Chinese never massively remove ethnic minority away from their homeland. As far as I know.
That's one thing really angers Chinese, is the unfairness in being judged, by the Western community, when the Europeans have been just as guilty in the past and present.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States

This is a bit off the topic, but I just want to get this off my chest. The European countries and US view China as a threat, is a bit ludicrous, the European countries and US, in the past and now, were and have/had been a threat to countries in Asia, and Africa, and Middle East, and to the natives in American continent. If the US would reserve the right to attack a country without having been attacked by it first, US is statistically of now a real threat to world peace. Asian countries(except Japan, which is a big threat to Asia, in many Asian minds, if they are strong again militarily) and African countries never attacked Europe, or North/South America. China had sophisticated navigation for centuries, the Dynasty's Imperial fleet went to as far as Africa, and DIDN'T invade any land in Africa. China was only doing trades for centuries and centuries with the Arabs and Persians,as well as with the Europeans. Mongolians for the short duration of their control over the Middle Kingdom(China), raided a large part of the world during Yuan Dynasty but Mongolians are not Hans, who are the majority. China was the only country during WW2(if I remember correctly) that had no quota for the European Jews to escape to. Of course that's never mentioned in any Hollywood movies. Photographer Helmut Newton almost went to China during WW2, he ended up in Singapore instead. I feel, before European politicians point their fingers at China, they have to look into their past before harshly judging another country.

Reply to this >



Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

As far as I'm concerned I feel it is time to move on ... for me... :):)

Nationalism ... wherever in the world can be really scary !, that is my very personal opinion and I hope my opinion will be respected as I try to respect others people's opinions, believes and convictions as long as they are harmless and open to reasoning and not blindly bias. I personally will never be able to grasp, understand blind loyalties such as Nationalism... if we can call it that ! ... and after having read the bold and insensitive statements by the writer Lulu Wang against the Tibetan people and the western media while she herself enjoys her freedom of speech and movement in Europe I realise now that it is futile to continue on the subject ! ...

In Lulu Wang's case I find it rather pointless to engage in a logical, peaceful, meaningful discussion that becomes a kind of charade if just to back unconditionally the Chinese government's top elite actions for the sake of
being loyal to China ......which I personally find to be two different distinct things !

I'm sincerely sorry if this issue upsets you !... but I see no reason why one should be subjected to an endless lecture about Bush and America, or Europe for that matter which by the way are very open and democratic societies with a huge degree of tolerance as far as I know and where all its citizens can openly ventilate their opinions against their governments without having to fear persecution , torture or incarceration for that matter !

Thank you very much for the time .

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

Why would you feel uncomfortable if upsetting me in a written discussion? That's what understanding is about-through heated debates and arguments, in human history, even through war, I for one never grew up in Communist society, but I know somewhat of Chinese history since both of my parents families escaped right before Communism took over China. I now am beginning to understand that, we, human beings, are all the same, we could be conditioned, look at the people who stayed behind, when communism took over East Germany, the eastern block of Europe, Russia, China, North Korea, this system brings out ugliness in humanity. So while we are enjoying our freedom in the west, don't ever think we wouldn't fall into that if one day the political climate changes, even in recent times-this switch to more "political correctness"-is a more conservative, collective, more left, less tolerant of human shortcomings and negativities in a way, than before, where we are living, as an open society, are enjoying less personal freedom as we speak.

Reply to this >



Showing messages 1–10 of 56

SHOWstudio © 2008 Terms & Conditions