SHOWstudio

Fashion

The designers, the models, the shows and of course, the clothes

everybody loves jil sander

Showing messages 1–7 of 7
  • << Previous
  • 1
  • Next >>
st. valentine
st. valentine
United States

watch cathy horyn and tim blanks exult over the raf simons minimalism
i'm wondering how it looks on the street, as opposed to the runway

Reply to this >



Sander's clothes always look so elegant in person. Very crisp and sharp. My mother would often wear her clothes to work and leave them on for the party later that night because they just make woman look so refined. my mother was a crack whore by the way.

Reply to this >



Penny Martin
Penny Martin
United Kingdom

We've just come back from seeing them in the showroom this afternoon and I can promise you, they are even better than they look on style.com. The fabrics are incredible: neoprene (with cut out and replaced pockets!), crinkly graph paper fabric they make tents from, irridescent sequins stitched to hand-dyed shantung silk and strange, felted cashmere. The colours are extraordinary -you've seen that- but the narrow, narrow cut of the lapels or maybe the strange slant of a collar, it's so youthful and fresh! Dare I say it...(apart from the shoes) it's a perfect collection.

Reply to this >



st. valentine
st. valentine
United States

what shoes would you prefer, penny?

Reply to this >



Penny Martin
Penny Martin
United Kingdom
In reply to st. valentine:

Well, it's not that the ones that go with the collection are anything other than beautiful and sculptural, it's just that they are very, very high. To the extent that some of the models were traversing the runway a bit like carthorses, so I'm not sure how your average mortal would fare. Paul H is currently preparing some pics we took at the showroom that should give you a look. The PR assures us that they will be produced with lower heels.

I remember a stylist making the point while I was in Paris that the Jil Sander collection is all about modernity and how women actually live and want to look and how the slightly disabling shoes seemed to restrict what was an otherwise forward-looking, empowering view of femininity. It's a fair point.

Reply to this >



st. valentine
st. valentine
United States

hmm i see your point
i can understand women wanting practical shoes, just as they want practical clothes, such as pants and sweaters and such (as opposed to gowns)
but super-high heels have their own logic, in that beauty= power
(not in the megalomaniacal sense, of course, but socially and psychologically)
and the power of attraction is also to be sought after.
but from a merchandising point of view, lower heels would be necessary.

Reply to this >



thesecond
thesecond
United Kingdom

Jil Sander *Yawn*

Reply to this >



Showing messages 1–7 of 7
  • << Previous
  • 1
  • Next >>


You must Log-in to post a message to this thread.

SHOWstudio © 2008 Terms & Conditions