SHOWstudio

Blog Comments

All your replies and responses to SHOWstudio Blog articles here

Becky Conekin Essay

Showing messages 11–20 of 30
Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

' So her rejection of fashion was a result of what she saw. ' ..... I find this hard to believe.... however true it might be !.... Perhaps that was the moment when she realised how 'shallow' she was and how wrong her values were ... but to reject fashion in order to announce to the whole wide world that you have regained ' control' of your life by rejecting you own femininity ..... that amounts ( in my opinion of course ! ) to wanting to punish yourself for the evils created by fellow humans , as in her case. What is the point in that ?...... ' altruism' towards fellow humans at its best ? ... However interesting and highly intellectual the whole episode may become ! ...is this a kind of ' Mea Culpa ' ?....... If that's true then we should definitely see the Pope , indeed, wearing a totally different kind of ....'fashion' as in robes .......

But if we are talking about characters such as IMELDA MARCOS...... then I can understand why Imelda would had want to pay penitence for her sins !

Reply to this >



la
la
United Kingdom

'it seems that your point that" fashion is fun when you are safe and well provided for and when you're not it seems less necessary" is completely disproved by Marcus Werner Heds (brilliant) film yesterday.Have a look and then see what you think.

Reply to this >



Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland
In reply to la:

yes !! .... the spellbinding pair of red shoes !... I was hoping someone will bring that up , because there is more than meets the eye in this story and appalling tragedy ...... and it disproves somehow such 'naive' believes about fashion ......

Reply to this >



Great article. I wonder as well about the form of fashion photography in the post-war period. In the 1930s and even the 1940s, it was possible to be a surrealist and a fashion photographer - to combine that kind of politics with fashion - does the form of fashion photography allow this in the 1950s?

Reply to this >



Dr. Conekin's essay gives a good example of how the war divided people's lives into the 'before and after' of pleasures and guilt. Unlike WWI, where nobody won and most everyone was killed, and all of Europe ended up ashamed, the stark moral issues of WWII required individuals to figure out what had to change now and for them. Women like Lee Miller--who had experienced the war at the front -- and women who got nowhere near it -- were alike being counted (at least among themselves) as moral agents. I think Conekin is absolutely right to make this point in the case of MIller.

But I also think that Miller's post-war life as Conekin and her witnesses attest, is about the problems of being a beautiful woman who grows old: the anecdotes of her getting fat and losing her hair sound like symptoms of menopause: there was no HRT therapy around then. The comments by those around her remind me of the fate of her contemporary Barbara Skelton, who had started out as a model for Schiaparelli and became one of the central figures who wrote for and edited Cyril Connelley's important journal, HORIZON, all the while choosing husbands and lovers from Fitzrovia and beyond (she figured as the temptress Pamela Flitton in Anthony Powell's A DANCE TO THE MUSIC OF TIME). Skelton's brilliantly hilarious two-volume autobiography details her frustration and surprise at becoming an older woman whose former lovers were now loving women decades younger than Skelton herself. In her case, some of her rebellion against age took the form of her satirical writing about the coterie in which she had been the Femme Fatale.

Certainly Skelton was furious at being deprived of the kind of sex life that she, like many others who had been known for their beauty and seductiveness, had considered to be part of who they were. But that fury doesn't speak its name -- in Skelton's case, it was called alcoholism.

Great essay -- lets learn more about how women deal with sex and appearance all the way through their lives, and about how War changes everything.

Reply to this >




ceekaylau
United Kingdom

Certainly a lot to think about, protest fashion and the politics of dressing against the New Look grain. While others in America were busy buying up their 2 cars, bungalows and displaying conspicuous consumption, Miller went in the opposite direction. Her need to compensate for the horrors of war is activistic, perhaps even moralistic in chastising fashion as trivial. Also interesting re: Miller taking up gourmet cooking. While food is a necessity, it is then transformed into some artistic enterprise as 'cuisine' and therefore, an ultimate luxury to be playing with one's food.

Reply to this >



Karl Fuler
Karl Fuler
United Kingdom
In reply to ceekaylau:

Gourmet cooking is about making the most of your food and the eating experience. It is all about appreciation, not about proving your worth to others.

Reply to this >




ceekaylau
United Kingdom
In reply to Karl Fuler:

While this may be the main objective for many re: gourmet food, you simply cannot play with this idea if you are going hungry. The idea of this kind of 'appreciation' is a luxury in itself. Point in case: looking around at high-end food shops and food as lifestyle/fashion, one cannot deny this is something only afforded to those who do not have to worry about where the next meal is coming from. It is something made worthy by the bourgeois like everything else they claim is of a certain 'taste', as in the case of many high cultural forms such as art or music.

Reply to this >



Karl Fuler
Karl Fuler
United Kingdom
In reply to ceekaylau:

There is a big difference between appreciating food/ eating, and following culinary fashions & notions of status within all that. !!!!

Reply to this >



Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

.... there is a kind of irony in this example ..... different circumstances sure .... but ! and in my opinion there is a 'but ' , were the person who might be going hungry given the choice between which store would they want to go into in order get that very desperate needed meal ..... and chose for him/herself between Tesco or Harrods' Food Hall .... I really wonder which of the two would be chosen and why ? .... To dream ? To enjoy the meal ? or just simply to fill the stomach ? ..... yes those red shiny shoes keep coming back to my mind, even when they meant a big sacrifice but if just to put them on .... for a very short moment in a cut short life .....

Reply to this >



Showing messages 11–20 of 30

SHOWstudio © 2008 Terms & Conditions