ALL ABOUT.......the right place......the right moment.....the right opportunity......
ALL ABOUT.......the right place......the right moment.....the right opportunity......
From Galileo's Universe, 08:43 Sun 09 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts
Keith Haring was quite a good illustrator , I'll give
you that , but 'artist' ? , don't make me laugh .
Your picture of him defacing an advertising space
just proves my point , but at least this humorous scribble
could be removed or posted over fairly easily .
I particularly dislike those who see fit to using spray
paint directly onto buildings .
'Graffiti Art' is an oxymoron .
From Cymbeline, 08:58 Sun 09 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 60 posts
...I selected this one for a reason.....I particularly find the add
next to it more visually polluting......but that is of course one opinion among millions......
From Galileo's Universe, 10:14 Sun 09 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts
............................................. ' POINTS OF VIEW '.........................................
From Galileo's Universe, 09:42 Sun 09 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts
...of course he was a good ' illustrator'.....but in my humble opinion Art is not about craft and ability......Art is what you make of it according to each individual's personal believes and convictions...thanks God for that!!...
Art is , and I believe, more than that !....it is like a 'sixth sense '.....
Art is about ' sense '.......but then again that is what I personally believe......:):):)
From Galileo's Universe, 10:07 Sun 09 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts
PS........
To find out wether KEITH HARING...was an artist or not...perhaps it might help to go trough the following list ( REF.:Interpreting Art Reflecting, Wondering, Responding- by Terry Barret )... because such opinion shouldn't be arbitrary but subjected to a serious discussion.......that would be fair to him and his talent...:
- What are my initial reactions to this work?
- Does it stir an emotional response in me? If so, what emotion and why?
- What are the elements within the composition and how do they relate to one another?
- What do I know about this artist's other works?
- What do I know about the time period the artist lived in and other artistic movements the artist was involved in or may have been influenced by?
- What historical events were taking place during this time that may have
impacted the work of this artist?
- Why did the artist make these choices at this time?
- What ideas did I discover in spending the time to get to know this work?
- Do I feel differently about this work now that I know more about the artist, the time period, the piece itself and its meaning?
..............I hope it helps ..........LOL!!!
From Galileo's Universe, 12:18 Sun 09 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts
I had never found Keith's art compelling, just not my style. He had certain business sense to market himself different than other graffiti artists. Keith was a very successful commercial artist, his style of work worked really well on T-shirts and billboards. He was able to translate what was usually perceived as vandalism in public space into attractive graphics on t-shirts and posters and into museums and galleries. He was daring in that sense to pursue the high profile route.
From KaWai, 17:30 Mon 10 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 962 posts
....when personal taste comes into it ...then it is always tricky to asses someone's work to validate it as ART....nevertheless...there is only one Keith Haring and his Art...the same way there is only one Andy Warhol and his Art.....and they all did catch the public's imagination......when that happens you cannot shy away from commerce ...just like Dali's work.....
But the artists I mentioned above were true about what they were doing...that was their 'sense'.......they were not just trying to impress anyone as far as I see it....which now brings me to the following thought........Aren't then now days to many people calling themselves ... "Artist'....when in true perspective they are merely....artisans...or ' show-business' individuals who just want to become famous for its own sake and have the public adoration to make them feel.........'Artist' ?.......I dare to say that Jeff Koons was/is in my opinion just a very able and a good one........'show businessman'........he does have it....his sense.....his business sense.......but that doesn't mean that I don't like some of his work.....on the contary I like his ' balloon' pieces....but then again that is very representative of what Art has really become......no ESSENCE just AIR.....and like a balloon.......no very lasting.....you cannot say that about Keith Haring....he was a commercially successful artist ( that was not his fault :):)).......but/and a lasting one .........and most of what we see today .....no need to mentioned it :):)......has a very, very limited.....'expiration date'....that is commerce but without the ... ' ART... SENSE '......... as in the ' sixth sense '.....it's just the way I see it...
.
From Galileo's Universe, 08:48 Tue 11 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts
What are you saying ?
That Keith Haring was a balloon ?
Are you mental ?
From Cymbeline, 23:20 Wed 12 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 60 posts
Do pardo me.... but....you're rather funny....! if you cannot follow for whatever reason ( and I can understand why you can't ! ) .., please ask just like any civilised normal grown up human being would do...:):)...being rude and childish towards others because you may feel frustrated will not make you any clever....it will just make you look rather.... very silly as in silly if you can undertand me ....so I wonder who is who ?...LOL!....
....and to answer you question....' No I'm not saying that Keith Haring is a balloon'...and those are not my words, those are your words ....in case you cannot understand what I'm saying....thank you !...
RUDE| adjectiveORIGIN Middle English (in sense 2 , also [uncultured] ): from Old French, from Latin rudis'unwrought'(referring to handicraft), figuratively [uncultivated] ; someone who lacks consideration for the feelings of others and who is deliberately insolent is rude (: It was rude of you not to introduce me to your friends). Ill-mannered suggests that the person is ignorant of the rules of social behavior rather than deliberately rude (: an ill-mannered child), while uncivil implies disregard for even the most basic rules of social behavior among civilized people ( | his uncivil response resulted in his being kicked out of the classroom).
From Galileo's Universe, 07:30 Thu 13 Sep 2007 | Profile +++++ | 1245 posts