SHOWstudio

Photography and Filmmaking

Creative, conceptual and technical; contemporary and historical

Industry

Showing messages 1–10 of 33


I've been taking photographs since I was nine years old, I ran away from school to do a photography course and I have been working as a photographer in London and erratically in Paris for the past four years (though it seems like an eternity).

What I wanted opinions on, is that over the past few years I've been expolited by various photography agencies, stabbed in the back by handfuls of nasty industry people and ripped of by clients for thousands of pounds (generally by those who think they can take advantage of me being a young artist). My stress levels are through the roof, I'm working what feels like 24 hours a day trying to get appointments and shoots, and I'm constantly broke. I'm worried that through the nightmares I generally have to put up with through work, I'm losing my love for photography and forgetting the reason I took pictures in the first place.

I don't understand why, in London especially there aren't more outlets for young creativity. I mean it's all very well shooting stories on spec for magazines but bearing in mind even shooting a good test will set the photographer back at least £500, it's pretty unrealistic that you can do this on a regular basis (especially seeing as renting a shoebox any where in this city costs more than you can possibly earn anyway).

Recently model agencies have started charging editorial fee's for their models as it's apparently unfair for models to shoot for tears. I don't understand why the photographer is never considered in this equation, surely it's unfair for us to pay out all the expenses, and not get paid at the end of it.

Add to this the fact that magazines like Dazed and confused seem to only publish stories by art students with disposable cameras, as a bonafide photographer the future sure looks bleak...

Reply to this >



BillySoh
BillySoh
Singapore
In reply to :

Its pretty sad to know, but it is happening anywhere and everywhere!

Reply to this >




999

the marriage of art and commerce can be so tragic. this is why nothing beats projects where no one is after money.

Reply to this >



Such is life. It is quite tough out there anywhere but the toughest is to know how to get payed.
First by being the best in what you do, then to show the point of the iceberg and ask to see the money if they want more.

Reply to this >



I'm surprised this hasn't illicited more constructive responses!

But then I don't know the answers either really. When I left art school I worked for a top photo agency for a year or so. There was never any question that I wouldn't leave to be the photographer I knew myself to be, but for the year I was there it was like being at a kind of finishing school - I got to meet a lot of my idols and ask them how they worked. One in particular told me he'd spent 10 years subbing for local newspapers before he could say he was just earning an honorable living as a photographer, and then becoming member of one of the most reknowned agencies in the world sometime later didn't necessarily mean things were much easier for him.

If all you're interested in is a fast buck, maybe you're going about it the wrong way. If you love photography you'll hang in there. Photographers do have rights, that have been hard won and need to be continually defended, but whoever said making it would be easy? Nobody owes you anything. Strive to be the best photographer you can possibly be - but learn to be good at business while you're at it. The two aren't incompatible. Your anger is though.

wish I could add more concrete advice, but this is an issue I'm still working on myself...

P.S. 990000, I hope for your own sake you're independently wealthy, because you're up you're own A!

Reply to this >




999

f:lux, I think you gravely missed my point. did you assume I meant working for free?

Reply to this >



It certainly sounded that way. So what's the point you were trying to make?

Reply to this >




999

that trying to make a living out of art can be costly. and that it is better to do what you love *not* for money.

Reply to this >



It's perhaps irrelevant now anyway. This subject was posted over a month ago, and after responding I noticed that ben morris is no longer subscribed. Who knows where he is and what he's doing now. Shit.

Reply to this >



Do you know of Damien Hirst? I really like what he does, on the whole, and from what I've heard he doesn't put out for less than £25,000 - £250,000. Passion can have a price.

Reply to this >



Showing messages 1–10 of 33

SHOWstudio © 2009 Terms & Conditions