SHOWstudio

Photography and Filmmaking

Creative, conceptual and technical; contemporary and historical

The Death of Photography.

Showing messages 1–10 of 38
nick knight
nick knight
United Kingdom

On this dark grey and rainy morning it is hard not to feel some sadness about this statement,however it is not in any way a lamentable or tragic statement rather a celebration of a necessary and forward looking step that I believe is happening in any case and should be recognized and acknowledged in order for an extremely exciting new medium to be born and grow.
In the last month It has been confirmed to me that there is to be no more 10/8 polaroid made.In isolation this may not seem to be an event of such magnitude but it is important as it represents for me the only reason to use film over digital.
I have worked almost exclusively for the last 15 years on 10/8 enjoying the challenge of working with such a physically demanding piece of equipment,learning how to sometimes throw it around and treat it literally like a snapshot camera and at other times enjoy the formality and rigour that it forces on the sitter.It has been integral to my belief that I don't 'capture' a photograph,but 'create' it.It seemed to me it was the ultimate technical challenge,all other formats just paled in comparison.
Without polaroid,10/8 becomes almost impossible to work with in any practical and commercial way.
However in parallel to this I have always found equal pleasure in all the new forms of image creation,going right back to the linear distortions of the scitex machine in the mid1980s ,through hours of pleasure on the Quantel graphic Paintbox in the late 80s early 90s,followed quickly by the rise of Adobe Photoshop,the revolutionary 3d scanners, the simply stunning introduction of the mobile phone camera,and of course all this finding its very own global distribution network of the Internet allowing the dimensions of sound,movement and interactivity to be incorporated,which far outstrip the possibilities and reach of the one previously dominant form of image distribution, print.
Over the last 25 years I have watched, encouraged ,participated in and I hope in some way helped the birth of a completly new medium of communication.
My reason to write this piece is that in aknowledging this new medium and celebrating its' exsistance is to allow it to grow and forfil its amazing potential unhindered by having to masqurade as photography. On my Leica I have a setting for Video and a lead to download image and film onto my computer,surely this is no longer a camera in the sense we have understood photography.
It is a bit like having a T.V. set but selling it as a radio that ,by the way you can also see films on.It is no longer a radio! And all the better for that.
I am sure this piece will draw hostility partly because people will come rushing to the defense of Photography ,but I have no intention of attacking what has been one of the most powerful mediums and created some of the most beautiful images to fuel our dreams and uplift us as a people.It has shown us things we needed to see and been witness to visions of ourselves that we would never have seen with out it, it has literally bought light to where there was none.
Personally it has been my love,my hate and my passport into every and any situation I wanted to go into. It has been my reason to exist.
The world has changed since the invention of photography, which is a medium defined by a set of parameters from the zone system to the descisive moment. None of these parameters apply in the new medium ,it is therefore a different medium. The publics growing distrust and therefor dislike of photography is based around the issue of truth.My opinion is that central to this debate is that we are not being honest with ourselves to what medium we are actually using.
A total revolution in communication has happened . To meet the simply stunning possibilities of this new medium that allows us for the first time in our history as a species to communicate globally with each other with out it being shaped changed or manipulated for somebody to make financial profit from that communication,we must see it as what it really is .

Reply to this >



Josh Baker
Josh Baker
United Kingdom
In reply to nick knight:

Photography may no longer be conducted in the traditional sense but it isn't dead. You've not really made a valid argument in my opinion. I consider taking any type of photo with any type of camera 'photography', creative or otherwise.

Technology has indeed surged forward, but the combination of devices is simply the combination of devices. Instead of carrying two devices, you carry one that serves both functions. Both a camera and a video camera in a single device, for example. They both serve different functions. A camera for photography and a video camera for film.

Perhaps I am naive enough to have misinterpreted your point, being that I can never truly appreciated traditional film photography having been educated purely digital.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Josh Baker:

It was 4 years ago when my photographer was using only 8by10 and 4by5 sheets positive to shoot product, and he was shooting that way for 15 years prior to switching to digital, now he only shoots in digital, the lighting process is the same, instead of polaroids, we could see the result on the monitor immediately. Commercially there's no point to shoot with film, it's more time consuming and costly. For personal use I still like shooting with film. There's a ritual to loading film and mentally thinking about the light and time exposure which helps you stay sharp on your techniques.

Reply to this >



In reply to Josh Baker:

i guess what is being said is if you change the rules to a game it is no longer the same game

Reply to this >



In reply to nick knight:

Dated March 13th from Ilford:
"HARMAN technology Limited have entered into discussions that are currently on-going with POLAROID regarding the potential manufacture of POLAROID monochrome products. It is unlikely that further news will be forthcoming before the end of March.

When, and if, both companies have something more concrete to announce a press release from both organisations will be issued. We would to acknowledge and thank all those who have contacted HARMAN technology LImited, either personally or via the save POLAROID campaign".

Also, if digital is supposedly in the process of destroying photography as we know and love it, how to explain the Fuji has just developed a new medium format analogue camera?

And though Polaroid is arguably in a class of its own, try telling the people still using alternative processes (for ex, Chuck Close daguerrotypes, anybody?) that photography is dead!

So before it actually croaks - and until then it's not too late - get thee over to http://www.savepolaroid.com/

Reply to this >



shaw
shaw
United Kingdom
In reply to nick knight:

i think its interesting but also sad whats happening,i think its sad that nobodys making prints anymore,well when i say nobody...i mean nobody but the "blytons","fine-art"and "professional" photographers.
i love the archival nature of prints and that thing of passing images onto future generations,you may say this is true of digital..but with technology changing so fast any archival digital system quickly becomes outmoded..you could turn on your computer and those images are gone for ever.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States

The technique to lighting and backdrops don't change;in terms of photo retouching, it's another matter, a matter of how much to change after the reality has been captured. How do documentary photographers feel about digital cameras? I think they love the mobility of digital photography where they don't have to carry films around.

Reply to this >



At this moment in time digital image capture devices (including high res backs) can not compete with the quality of conventional 10x8 emulsion.

If the film ends so too does the use of it and those who took advantage of its unique characteristics have no option but to adapt. This obviously means going digital and as the results are much more instantly viewable the composition, lighting etc can be instantly be altered until satisfactory. So as the photographers creative and scientific skill, judgment and experience in such factors are needless, so too is the photographer and there you have the death of photography!

Photography is reaching the end of its life. Soon film will not be available and the new DIY medium will give way to a new one which hurts my head trying to figure out how it will evolve. I don’t think anyone can predict that.

I recognize that that statement is an incredibly important one made by Nick and the photography world will pick up on it.

It really is time to stop using the word ‘Photography’ as much as it seems alien.

But rest assure it is by no means an end to creative expression and should be seen as something truly exciting.

What a time to be an image maker!!

Reply to this >



*Photography is reaching the end of its life. Soon film will not be available and the medium will give way to a the new DIY one which hurts my head trying to figure out how it will evolve. I don’t think anyone can predict that.

Reply to this >



KaWai
KaWai
United States
In reply to Patch:

I think there are 2 schools of believers. I think the digital side is winning, but the technique of lighting and understanding lighting and composition is in the end the ingredience to making good pictures, whether studio or location, from fashion to documentary to still product photography.

Reply to this >



Showing messages 1–10 of 38

SHOWstudio © 2008 Terms & Conditions