In reply to aelizbet:
In response, I point to the cod piece and peascod belly of the 16th C. That was when men became padded peacocks, (think Henry VIII) an extreme point in history for men's fashions. Look at the duck bill shoes of the time. How similar are they to today's Crocs? The accompanying jacket, ruff and trunk-hose flattened and lengthened and became the forerunner for men's suits today.
While women's styles began to have a shorter life cycle, men's styling conversely slowed down. Look at how far women had to come in the 20th C. i.e.) the right to vote, choosing a career etc. Basic freedoms once won were celebrated. One way was through clothing. So, while women were expressing themselves and their freedoms visually via clothing, men were conforming with the establishment. To conform meant belonging and rising through the ranks. They had a lot to lose should they look out of place. Women had nothing to lose.
The 21C seems to be showing more choice in men's wear than we've seen in a century. I think for a time this will continue. Regardless of gender there will be freedom of expression in clothing. Fashion will be interesting. But regardless of how we choose to dress, it will tell on us. Our world view will be self evident through our dress.
Then, we will see possibly a uniform nondescript robe, possibly akin to what we think of a judge wearing. The purpose would be to remain anonymous. This would keep the business at hand as the focus, not who we are. ie) religion, political leaning, sexual orientation etc.
Reply to this >
From
mmbbaa,
14:19 Tue 10 Jul 2007 |
Profile
+++++ |
39 posts