SHOWstudio

Fashion

The designers, the models, the shows and of course, the clothes

Fashion and Politics

Showing messages 1–3 of 3
AUDRIECHOW
AUDRIECHOW
United States

Fashion and politics have always grabbed me with great interest. You see in this election how Obama memorabilia sky rocketed into t-shirts, pins, stickers, hats, jackets, pants,…etc. While the opposing side got little to no recognition. The same could be thought of the fashion during the Vietnam era. The anti protest message of the “hippies” with their long hair and long flowing fashions. The fashions seemed to have an underlying sense of truly being free…freedom. Even going farther back to the “flappers” or hoodlums of the twenties. Fashion is truly a status symbol. Back in Egyptian times jewelry was prominent with men as well as women. Men wore make up and wigs just as the women. The more you had in Egyptian times, especially clothing meant more wealth. In the Greek and Roman times it was the way you wore your toga. Moving into the medieval time hygiene was not as important and religion reigned. Kings and Queens had many possessions including a variety of garments. None which were of “label” brands naturally all the people looked to the court to see what was up and coming in the latest fashions. People looked to one of the many King Louis to see his fashion, if he wore blue bows in his hair , they would, if his hair appeared matted , they would buy wigs to emulate that. But one he grew ill , the bows fell off, and an individualism occurred. People started wearing different colored bows as well as variations of different garments based on what you could afford. Coming into the twentieth century it seems all fashion was and ever will be is keeping up with the “jones’” . Who has what next hair fad, who bought the new shoes at Nordstrom, who has the shortest skirt , nicest earrings, its quite incredible. And then the mention of lines come in Dolce and Gabana, Versace…etc. The celebrity comes in effect of fashion from political back in the 18th century to watching fame become policy.Where does the fine line of evolving fashion, politically and historically come about? Where does the obsolete fashions end and the reborn ones begin?

Reply to this >



Tnfierro
Tnfierro
Cuba
In reply to AUDRIECHOW:

It’s weird how two very different things can be combined into one so easily. Politics is the practice or profession of conducting political affairs and fashion is a prevailing custom or style of dress, etiquette, socializing. They may come together. Yes politicians use t-shirts and other clothing items to get publicity. I am not one to follow politics, but understand how graphic designers may enjoy creating publicity shirts. Many people where who they support. For example look at our presidential election all you saw was Obama or McCain shirts and merchandise. Designers may do the same thing to get more noticed. Like how Tommy Hilfiger got well known. He used a huge T on a sweater he sold to a store. It is a very smart thing to do. It is a good way of advertising.

Reply to this >



Karl Fuler
Karl Fuler
United Kingdom

As you point out, the reasons for things becoming fashionable remain consistent throughout history i.e. a desire for status and maintaining to keep that status exclusive - hence a need for fashions to constantly change.

Reply to this >



Showing messages 1–3 of 3


You must Log-in to post a message to this thread.

SHOWstudio © 2009 Terms & Conditions