SHOWstudio

Fashion

The designers, the models, the shows and of course, the clothes

IO TAKEMURA SLOW FASHION

Showing messages 11–15 of 15
Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

Katharine Hamnett at her Spring/Summer 2004 show at London Fashion Week
http://www.chinadaily.com

! .... but ... fashion can play a role in a certain way, in certain....... politics.
POLITICS that can create impact in society and the environment by taking direct action in how it conducts its business ethics ..... and yet continue to play the role as LA explains ...... I don't really believe, in my opinion, that fashion is totally castrated ... or indeed a total ' eunuch' ... For one thing fashion has a mayor share in the state of affairs as far as the environment is concerned ... COTTON have a huge and devastating impact in the supply of WATER ... . so what is the fashion industry doing about that ? .... and what about CHILD LABOUR ? .... what is fashion really doing about that ?.....
The problem with fashion is that it cannot project that in the world of visual aesthetics ... but it can do that behind the doors by developing its own political code of conduct ..... that certainly would make far more quick and tangible impact than a Benetton t'shirt with glitter saying ......... ' Let's all care for our environment because we are all in it ' ... but it can certainly help to create some awareness , however 'flat' the canvas is, and however 'one seasonal ' the message unfortunately is doomed to be ...... but nevertheless the message does have the great advantage to reach the corners of the world in a second.... and is bound to make some people think !.... if just for a moment...

However shallow fashion in the end may be to be able to deliver a political message , and however constrained its political role in reality is according to our imbedded perceptions about fashion's purpose and role in society .... one thing is for sure .... it is 10 for 12:00 and fashion has no option but to take its 'political' responsibility .... however pretty flimsy and contradictory that role appears to be...

Reply to this >



ART!

Reply to this >



friend
friend
France

As long as fashion has been in style, clothing has been used to express the beliefs, ideals, and socioeconomic status of the wearer. From the deep purple robes worn by the aristocracy of Renaissance Europe, to the peace-symboled, tie-dyed T-shirts of 1960's hippies, what a person wears has been a medium of communication for people who have something they want the rest of the world to know. How can fashion not be seen as political?

Reply to this >



Galileo's Universe
Galileo's Universe
Greenland

Pic.: www.metafilter.com/ tags/waste

FAST FASHION
by io takemura

"This film investigates approaches that could encourage people to be more aware of ethical issues within fashion consumption. It's the time for the consumers should stop and rethink what they are dealing with when they consume and start making difference individually and start showing their own character within fashion identity."
_________________________________________________________________________

Couldn't agree more !........ CONSUMERS are indeed the KEY to a BETTER use of FASHION and to make a difference ' politically ' as in.... become truly aware of the devastating effect their uncontrolled and blind urge to generate tons and tons of FASHION WASTE causes to the planet !

Reply to this >



laurenelixabeth
laurenelixabeth
United States
In reply to Galileo's Universe:

I suppose the difference in the way fashion and politics intersect historically and presently is the fact that within the last 35 years, fashion is now *supposed* to have a political agenda. While it arguably always did--certain fabrics and colors being reserved for royals in the courts of France and England, wearing pants in the 1920s, etc.--it seems now to be a requirement of a designer to have a political POV. Kenneth Cole feels the need to let us know in every ad about his political leanings; Stella McCartney is vigilant about using only natural fabrics and shunning all leather and fur. Introducing designers' politics into their lines and marketing actually increases economic viability and creates buzz, well above what their not-so-creative visions alone could have drawn.

What though is intrinsically wrong with having fashion as a purely aesthetic art? If anything, relegating fashion to the ornamental realm is *more* radical that writing a throwaway comment about sweatshop labor on top of your ad for expensive clothes. Why force a political consciousness to intersect where it isn't required or desired? Fashion today is more mainstream, more about business; half of today's indie designers are owned by hedge funds. I'd love to see it swing further back toward being more conceptual, innovative, more decorative.

Reply to this >



Showing messages 11–15 of 15


You must Log-in to post a message to this thread.

SHOWstudio © 2008 Terms & Conditions